[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016075520.eauiemlvbo5a37d4@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:55:21 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/34] m68k/coldfire: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION
On 2019-10-16 10:50:41 [+1000], Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Greg,
> On 16/10/19 5:17 am, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > CONFIG_PREEMPTION is selected by CONFIG_PREEMPT and by CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT.
> > Both PREEMPT and PREEMPT_RT require the same functionality which today
> > depends on CONFIG_PREEMPT.
> >
> > Switch the entry code over to use CONFIG_PREEMPTION.
> >
> > Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
Thank you.
> Do you want me to take this via the m68knommu git tree?
> Or are you taking the whole series via some other tree?
It is up to you. You have all the dependencies so you can either add it
to your -next branch or leave it and we will pick it up for you.
> Regards
> Greg
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists