linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] software node: add support for reference properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191016080224.GR32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:02:24 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] software node: add support for reference
 properties

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:57:47PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:38:37AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:07:07PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > These series implement "references" properties for software nodes as true
> > > properties, instead of managing them completely separately.
> > > 
> > > The first 10 patches are generic cleanups and consolidation and
> > > unification of the existing code; patch #11 implements moving of small
> > > properties inline when copying property entries; patch #12 implements
> > > PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF() and friends; patch #13 converts the user of
> > > references to the property syntax, and patch #14 removes the remains of
> > > references as entities that are managed separately.
> > 
> > Can we get some test cases?
> 
> Something like this? (I'll beef it up if we decide KUnit is OK for
> this).

As a starter, yes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko