| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <997b5b51-db71-3e27-1f84-cbaa24fa66c7@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:57:57 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, soft-offline: convert parameter to pfn
On 16.10.19 10:54, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.10.19 10:27, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 09:56:19AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 16.10.19 09:09, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wrote a simple cleanup for parameter of soft_offline_page(),
>>>>> based on thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/11/57.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know that we need more cleanup on hwpoison-inject, but I think
>>>>> that will be mentioned in re-write patchset Oscar is preparing now.
>>>>> So let me shared only this part as a separate one now.
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I think you should rebase that patch on linux-next (where the
>>>> pfn_to_online_page() check is in place). I assume you'll want to move the
>>>> pfn_to_online_page() check into soft_offline_page() then as well?
>>>
>>> I rebased to next-20191016. And yes, we will move pfn_to_online_page()
>>> into soft offline code. It seems that we can also move pfn_valid(),
>>> but is simply moving like below good enough for you?
>>
>> At least I can't am the patch to current next/master (due to
>> pfn_to_online_page()).
Could also be that my "git am" skills failed as the mail was not a
proper patch itself :)
>>
>>>
>>> @@ -1877,11 +1877,17 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
>>> * This is not a 100% solution for all memory, but tries to be
>>> * ``good enough'' for the majority of memory.
>>> */
>>> -int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
>>> +int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> - unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>> + struct page *page;
>>> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>>> + return -ENXIO;
>>> + /* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
>>> + if (!pfn_to_online_page(pfn))
>>> + return -EIO;
>>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>> if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
>>> pr_debug_ratelimited("soft_offline: %#lx page is device page\n",
>>> pfn);
>>> --
>>>
>>> Or we might have an option to do as memory_failure() does like below:
>>
>> In contrast to soft offlining, memory failure can deal with devmem. So I
>> think the above makes sense.
>
> OK, so here's the revised one.
>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> ---
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:00:33 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, soft-offline: convert parameter to pfn
>
> Currently soft_offline_page() receives struct page, and its sibling
> memory_failure() receives pfn. This discrepancy looks weird and makes
> precheck on pfn validity tricky. So let's align them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/memory.c | 7 +------
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
> mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
> mm/memory-failure.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
> index 55907c27075b..a757d9ed88a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
> @@ -538,12 +538,7 @@ static ssize_t soft_offline_page_store(struct device *dev,
> if (kstrtoull(buf, 0, &pfn) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> pfn >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
> - if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> - return -ENXIO;
> - /* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
> - if (!pfn_to_online_page(pfn))
> - return -EIO;
> - ret = soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), 0);
> + ret = soft_offline_page(pfn, 0);
> return ret == 0 ? count : ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 44d058723db9..fd360d208346 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2794,7 +2794,7 @@ extern int sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
> extern int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery;
> extern void shake_page(struct page *p, int access);
> extern atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly;
> -extern int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags);
> +extern int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
>
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 2be9f3fdb05e..99dd06fecfa9 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
> pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
> pfn, start);
>
> - ret = soft_offline_page(page, MF_COUNT_INCREASED);
> + ret = soft_offline_page(pfn, MF_COUNT_INCREASED);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> continue;
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 05c8c6df25e6..bdf408d7f65c 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!gotten)
> break;
> if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE)
> - soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(entry.pfn), entry.flags);
> + soft_offline_page(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
> else
> memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
> }
> @@ -1857,7 +1857,7 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
>
> /**
> * soft_offline_page - Soft offline a page.
> - * @page: page to offline
> + * @pfn: pfn to soft-offline
> * @flags: flags. Same as memory_failure().
> *
> * Returns 0 on success, otherwise negated errno.
> @@ -1877,11 +1877,17 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
> * This is not a 100% solution for all memory, but tries to be
> * ``good enough'' for the majority of memory.
> */
> -int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> +int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> {
> int ret;
> - unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + struct page *page;
>
> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> + return -ENXIO;
> + /* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
> + page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
> + if (!page)
> + return -EIO;
> if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
-> this is now no longer possible! So you can drop the whole if
(is_zone_device....) case
> pr_debug_ratelimited("soft_offline: %#lx page is device page\n",
> pfn);
>
Apart from that, looks good to me.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists