lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:29:38 +0800
From:   Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To:     Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: VMX: Setup MSR bitmap only when has msr_bitmap
 capability

On 10/16/2019 8:40 AM, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/15/2019 09:40 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> Move the MSR bitmap setup codes to vmx_vmcs_setup() and only setup them
>> when hardware has msr_bitmap capability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 58b77a882426..7051511c27c2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -4164,12 +4164,30 @@ static void ept_set_mmio_spte_mask(void)
>>   static void vmx_vmcs_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>   {
>>       int i;
>> +    unsigned long *msr_bitmap;
>>       if (nested)
>>           nested_vmx_vmcs_setup();
>> -    if (cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
>> -        vmcs_write64(MSR_BITMAP, __pa(vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap));
>> +    if (cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap()) {
>> +        msr_bitmap = vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_TSC, 
>> MSR_TYPE_R);
> 
> vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr() also calls cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap(), 
> which means we are repeating the check. A cleaner approach is to remove 
> the call to cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap()  from 
> vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr()  and let its callers do the check just 
> like you are doing here.
> 

Right.
I'll improve it. Thanks!

>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_FS_BASE, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_GS_BASE, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> +        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP, MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> +        if (kvm_cstate_in_guest(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) {
>> +            vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C1_RES, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> +            vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C3_RESIDENCY, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> +            vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C6_RESIDENCY, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> +            vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C7_RESIDENCY, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        vmcs_write64(MSR_BITMAP, __pa(msr_bitmap));
>> +    }
>> +    vmx->msr_bitmap_mode = 0;
>>       vmcs_write64(VMCS_LINK_POINTER, -1ull); /* 22.3.1.5 */
>> @@ -6697,7 +6715,6 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct 
>> kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>>   {
>>       int err;
>>       struct vcpu_vmx *vmx;
>> -    unsigned long *msr_bitmap;
>>       int cpu;
>>       BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(offsetof(struct vcpu_vmx, vcpu) != 0,
>> @@ -6754,22 +6771,6 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct 
>> kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>>       if (err < 0)
>>           goto free_msrs;
>> -    msr_bitmap = vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_TSC, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_FS_BASE, MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_GS_BASE, MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> -    vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP, 
>> MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> -    if (kvm_cstate_in_guest(kvm)) {
>> -        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_CORE_C1_RES, 
>> MSR_TYPE_R);
>> -        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C3_RESIDENCY, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> -        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C6_RESIDENCY, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> -        vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, 
>> MSR_CORE_C7_RESIDENCY, MSR_TYPE_R);
>> -    }
>> -    vmx->msr_bitmap_mode = 0;
>> -
>>       vmx->loaded_vmcs = &vmx->vmcs01;
>>       cpu = get_cpu();
>>       vmx_vcpu_load(&vmx->vcpu, cpu);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ