lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dcbcd6f-3789-69e1-b0c1-33416aa0790d@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:08:48 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        <namhyung@...nel.org>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        <lukemujica@...gle.com>, <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
        <linfeilong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Fix resource leak in process_mapfile()

>>> +            ret = -1;
>>> +            goto out;
>>
>> There's a subtle change of behaviour here, i.e. now calling print_mapping_table_suffix(), but I don't think that it makes any difference.
>>
> yes, I know that "goto out" will run print_mapping_table_suffix(outfp), because the error path before is done like this.
> so I think it should be use "goto out" to run run print_mapping_table_suffix(outfp).
>
>> However, does outfp remain open also in this case:
>>
> Because it has a comment that "Make build fail", so I am not handle the outfp, only modify the process_mapfile() function.
>
>> main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> {
>> ...
>>
>> if (process_mapfile(eventsfp, mapfile)) {
>>     pr_info("%s: Error processing mapfile %s\n", prog, mapfile);
>>     /* Make build fail */
>>     return 1;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> empty_map:
>>     fclose(eventsfp);
>>     ...
>> }
>>
>> I think that this code works on the basis that the program exits on any sort of error and releases resources automatically. Having said that, it is a good practice to tidy up.
>>
> I agree with you, when program exits, it will releases resources automatically. It's just to make the program clearer and more correct.

So can you make that change also (to close outfp)?

Thanks,
John

>
>> John
>>
>>>          }
>>>          line[strlen(line)-1] = '\0';
>>>
>>> @@ -825,7 +828,9 @@ static int process_mapfile(FILE *outfp, char *fpath)
>>>
>>>  out:
>>>      print_mapping_table_suffix(outfp);
>>> -    return 0;
>>> +    fclose(mapfp);
>>> +    free(line);
>>> +    return ret;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /*
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> .
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ