[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56c5408c-a217-18f3-8a0d-c0bb0886f2d3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:20:30 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf/x86/intel: implement LBR callstacks context
synchronization
On 10/16/2019 5:50 AM, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> Implement intel_pmu_lbr_sync_task_ctx() method that updates counter
> of the events that requested LBR callstack data on a sample.
>
> The counter can be zero for the case when task context belongs to
> a thread that has just come from a block on a futex and the context
> contains saved (lbr_stack_state == LBR_VALID) LBR register values.
>
> For the values to be restored at LBR registers on the next thread's
> switch-in event it copies the counter value that is expected to be
> non zero from the previous equivalent task perf event context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 9 +++++++++
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> index ea54634eabf3..152a3f8b516a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> @@ -417,6 +417,15 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
> cpuc->last_log_id = ++task_ctx->log_id;
> }
>
> +void intel_pmu_lbr_sync_task_ctx(struct x86_perf_task_context *one,
> + struct x86_perf_task_context *another)
> +{
> + if (!one || !another)
> + return;
> +
> + one->lbr_callstack_users = another->lbr_callstack_users;
We may want to swap here?
Thanks,
Kan
> +}
> +
> void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index a25e6d7eb87b..3e0087c06fc9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -1024,6 +1024,9 @@ void intel_pmu_store_pebs_lbrs(struct pebs_lbr *lbr);
>
> void intel_ds_init(void);
>
> +void intel_pmu_lbr_sync_task_ctx(struct x86_perf_task_context *one,
> + struct x86_perf_task_context *another);
> +
> void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in);
>
> u64 lbr_from_signext_quirk_wr(u64 val);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists