[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016131020.GE21367@pc-63.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:10:20 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bpf: add static in net/core/filter.c
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:02:31PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 16/10/2019 13:26, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
> > > There are a number of structs in net/core/filter.c
> > > that are not exported or declared outside of the
> > > file. Fix the following warnings by making these
> > > all static:
> > >
> > > net/core/filter.c:8465:31: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > net/core/filter.c:8472:27: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > [...]
> > > net/core/filter.c:8935:27: warning: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> > > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> > > Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
> > > Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> > > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > net/core/filter.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> > > index ed6563622ce3..f7338fee41f8 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/filter.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> > > @@ -8462,18 +8462,18 @@ static u32 sk_msg_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
> > > return insn - insn_buf;
> > > }
> > > -const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
> > > +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
> > > .get_func_proto = sk_filter_func_proto,
> > > .is_valid_access = sk_filter_is_valid_access,
> > > .convert_ctx_access = bpf_convert_ctx_access,
> > > .gen_ld_abs = bpf_gen_ld_abs,
> > > };
> >
> > Big obvious NAK. I'm puzzled that you try to fix a compile warning, but without
> > even bothering to compile the result after your patch ...
>
> builds fine. maybe some effort to stop this happening again should be made.
It doesn't build, because they are used/needed outside:
[...]
CC net/core/dev_ioctl.o
CC net/core/tso.o
net/core/filter.c:8467:38: error: static declaration of ‘sk_filter_verifier_ops’ follows non-static declaration
8467 | static const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5,
from ./include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:22,
from ./include/linux/cgroup.h:28,
from ./include/net/netprio_cgroup.h:11,
from ./include/linux/netdevice.h:42,
from ./include/net/sock.h:46,
from ./include/linux/sock_diag.h:8,
from net/core/filter.c:25:
./include/linux/bpf_types.h:5:44: note: previous declaration of ‘sk_filter_verifier_ops’ was here
5 | BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, sk_filter)
| ^~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/bpf.h:625:39: note: in definition of macro ‘BPF_PROG_TYPE’
625 | extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops _name ## _verifier_ops;
| ^~~~~
[...] ( and more of the same errors ... )
Powered by blists - more mailing lists