lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfZU-s2+cY5kpRTSDjc0TC1Xe4hnmY3bLBUPFqWMmo4wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:46:22 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@....fi>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] leds: pca953x: Use of_device_get_match_data()

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 1:42 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2019-10-15 02:02:01)
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:54 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2019-10-14 10:50:06)
> > > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 12:47 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:

> > > > Also, I'm thinking that following may help to clean a lot of the i2c
> > > > client drivers
> > > >
> > > > static inline // perhaps no
> > > > const void *i2c_device_get_match_data(struct i2c_client *client, const
> > > > struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > > > {
> > > >   if (id)
> > > >     return (const void *)id->driver_data;
> > > >   return device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looks alright to me. Maybe device_get_match_data() can look at the bus
> > > and call some bus op if the firmware match isn't present? Then we can
> > > replace a bunch of these calls with device_get_match_data() and it will
> > > "do the right thing" regardless of what bus or firmware the device is
> > > running on.
> >
> > It will be something ugly like
> >
> > buses {
> > #ifdef I2C
> > &i2c_bus_type,
> > #endif
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > in the code. I won't do this.
> >
> > See generic_match_buses[] for example.
>
> Why is it like generic_match_buses[]? I thought it would look at
> struct device::of_node or struct device::fw_node and try to extract
> device data out that and if that fails it would fallback to some new
> function like struct bus_type::get_match_data() that does the right
> thing for the bus. In the case of i2c it would extract the i2c_client's
> i2c_device_id pointer and return it onwards.

Can you send a patch for review?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ