[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2ca2396-8aae-842c-91f5-84c3e0fae70e@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:16:09 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with
a reference count of 0
On 16.10.19 16:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-10-19 15:55:00, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.10.19 15:45, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> There is state stored in the struct page. In other words this shouldn't
>>> be really different from HWPoison pages. I cannot find the code that is
>>> doing that and maybe we don't handle that. But we cannot simply online
>>> hwpoisoned page. Offlining the range will not make a broken memory OK
>>> all of the sudden. And your usecase sounds similar to me.
>>
>> Sorry to say, but whenever we online memory the memmap is overwritten,
>> because there is no way you could tell it contains garbage or not. You have
>> to assume it is garbage. (my recent patch even poisons the memmap when
>> offlining, which helped to find a lot of these "garbage memmap" BUGs)
>>
>> online_pages()
>> ...
>> move_pfn_range_to_zone(zone, pfn, nr_pages, NULL);
>> ...
>> memmap_init_zone()
>> -> memmap initialized
>>
>> So yes, offlining memory with HWPoison and re-onlining it effectively drops
>> HWPoison markers. On the next access, you will trigger a new HWPoison.
>
> Right you are! I need to sit on this much more and think about it with a
> clean head.
>
Sure, take your time and let me know if you need any details on how
virtio-mem works, how it uses these interfaces, and how the mm internals
it uses play along.
Thanks Michal!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists