[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191017085912.GA8594@amd>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:59:12 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 68/81] ACPICA: ACPI 6.3: PPTT add additional fields
in Processor Structure Flags
Hi!
> From: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
>
> Commit b5eab512e7cffb2bb37c4b342b5594e9e75fd486 upstream.
So this introduces another format of "upstream" information. So far I
had this:
ma = re.match(".*Upstream commit ([0-9a-f]*) .*", l)
...
ma = re.match("commit ([0-9a-f]*) upstream[.]*", l)
I believe this information belongs to the signoff area; it is
important to know who pushed patch to the upstream and who is pusing
it to the stable.
Could we just introduce "Upstream: <sha1>" tag and use it? It would
improve consistency...
Thanks,
Pavel
> ACPICA commit c736ea34add19a3a07e0e398711847cd6b95affd
>
> Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/c736ea34
> Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists