linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: simplify and remove lots of debug messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191017091416.GC8978@bogus>
Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:14:16 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: simplify and remove lots of debug messages

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:12:00AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-10-19, 12:03, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > cpufreq_arm_bL_ops is no longer needed after merging the generic
> > arm_big_little and vexpress-spc driver. Remove cpufreq_arm_bL_ops
> > and rename all the bL_* function names to ve_spc_*.
> >
> > This driver have been used for year now and the extensive debug
> > messages in the driver are not really required anymore.
>
> This does lots of cleanup in this patch and not strictly what the commit log
> says. Can you please create separate patches for remove ops, debug messages and
> other formatting things ?
>

Yes I did notice just after posting. These patches were sitting in my tree
for long time and didn't look at them in detail before posting. I will
split the patch accordingly.

--
Regards,
Sudeep