linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: amd: No need PCI-MSI interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:33:06 +0000
From:   vishnu <vravulap@....com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
CC:     "RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO" 
        <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "Mukunda, Vijendar" <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
        Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu <Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@....com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: amd: No need PCI-MSI interrupts



On 11/10/19 3:03 AM, vishnu wrote:
> Hi,
> Please find my inline comments.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vishnu
> 
> On 01/10/19 10:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 05:23:43PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>>
>>>> ACP-PCI controller driver does not depends msi interrupts.
>>>> So removed msi related pci functions which have no use and does not 
>>>> impact
>>>> on existing functionality.
>>
>>> In general, however, aren't MSIs preferred to legacy interrupts?
>>
>> As I understand it.  Or at the very least I'm not aware of any situation
>> where they're harmful.  It'd be good to have a clear explanation of why
>> we're removing the support.
> 
> Actually our device is audio device and it does not depends on MSI`s.
> So we thought to remove it as it has no purpose or meaning to have
> this code in our audio based ACP-PCI driver.
> 
>>> Doesn't the driver have to opt into MSI support?  As such, won't
>>> removing this code effectively disable MSI support?
>>
>> Yes.
> 
> 

Hi Mark,

Any updates on this patch.

Regards,
Vishnu