[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5aa79534-7059-09e7-00b8-752f6699f9d4@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:58:33 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, qperret@...rret.net,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, dh.han@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq()
On 11/10/2019 15:44, Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> index d249b88a4d5a..dd6a35f099ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,53 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> return pd->nr_cap_states;
> }
>
> +#define EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE 1024U
> +
> +/**
> + * em_pd_get_higher_freq() - Get the highest frequency that does not exceed the
> + * given cost margin compared to min_freq
> + * @pd : performance domain for which this must be done
> + * @min_freq : minimum frequency to return
> + * @cost_margin : allowed margin compared to min_freq, on the
> + * EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE scale.
> + *
> + * Return: the chosen frequency, guaranteed to be at least as high as min_freq.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long em_pd_get_higher_freq(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
> + unsigned long min_freq, unsigned long cost_margin)
> +{
> + unsigned long max_cost = 0;
> + struct em_cap_state *cs;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!pd)
> + return min_freq;
> +
> + /* Compute the maximum allowed cost */
> + for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_cap_states; i++) {
> + cs = &pd->table[i];
> + if (cs->frequency >= min_freq) {
> + max_cost = cs->cost +
> + (cs->cost * cost_margin) / EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE;
Maybe you could mention in the header that this is the place where the
algorithm could be tuned. (even though it doesn't offer any tuning
interface, which is a good thing).
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Find the highest frequency that will not exceed the cost margin */
> + for (i = pd->nr_cap_states-1; i >= 0; i--) {
> + cs = &pd->table[i];
> + if (cs->cost <= max_cost)
> + return cs->frequency;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We should normally never reach here, unless min_freq was higher than
> + * the highest available frequency, which is not expected to happen.
> + */
Maybe add a WARN_ONCE(1, "foobar"); here to indicate this unlikely event
(CPUfreq and EM framwork out of sync)?
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists