[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cc2aa18e2e6004ba099e69b41d0d505a4361443c.1571307382.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:00:50 +0530
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
edubezval@...il.com, agross@...nel.org, tdas@...eaurora.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, ilina@...eaurora.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] thermal: Initialize thermal subsystem earlier
Now that the thermal framework is built-in, in order to facilitate
thermal mitigation as early as possible in the boot cycle, move the
thermal framework initialization to core_initcall.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
---
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
index d21b754baee2..d8251d723459 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
@@ -1537,4 +1537,5 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
mutex_destroy(&poweroff_lock);
return result;
}
-fs_initcall(thermal_init);
+
+core_initcall(thermal_init);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists