[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191017115423.GH2751@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:54:23 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/lib/traceevent, perf tools: Handle %pU format
correctly
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:52:09PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:28:00AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > [BUG]
> > For btrfs related events, there is a field for fsid, but perf never
> > parse it correctly.
> >
> > # perf trace -e btrfs:qgroup_meta_convert xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 4k" \
> > /mnt/btrfs/file1
> > 0.000 xfs_io/77915 btrfs:qgroup_meta_reserve:(nil)U: refroot=5(FS_TREE) type=0x0 diff=2
> > ^^^^^^ Not a correct UUID
> > ...
> >
> > [CAUSE]
> > The pretty_print() function doesn't handle the %pU format correctly.
> > In fact it doesn't handle %pU as uuid at all.
> >
> > [FIX]
> > Add a new function, print_uuid_arg(), to handle %pU correctly.
> >
> > Now perf trace can at least print fsid correctly:
> > 0.000 xfs_io/79619 btrfs:qgroup_meta_reserve:23ad1511-dd83-47d4-a79c-e96625a15a6e refroot=5(FS_TREE) type=0x0 diff=2
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v2:
> > - Use more comment explaining the finetunings we skipped for %pU*
> > - Use more elegant way to output uuid string
> > ---
> > tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > index d948475585ce..3c9473f46efe 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include <errno.h>
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > #include <limits.h>
> > +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> > #include <linux/time64.h>
> >
> > #include <netinet/in.h>
> > @@ -4508,6 +4509,45 @@ get_bprint_format(void *data, int size __maybe_unused,
> > return format;
> > }
> >
> > +static void print_uuid_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void *data, int size,
> > + struct tep_event *event, struct tep_print_arg *arg)
> > +{
> > + unsigned char *buf;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (arg->type != TEP_PRINT_FIELD) {
> > + trace_seq_printf(s, "ARG TYPE NOT FIELID but %d", arg->type);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!arg->field.field) {
> > + arg->field.field = tep_find_any_field(event, arg->field.name);
> > + if (!arg->field.field) {
> > + do_warning("%s: field %s not found",
> > + __func__, arg->field.name);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if (arg->field.field->size < 16) {
> > + trace_seq_printf(s, "INVALID UUID: size have %u expect 16",
> > + arg->field.field->size);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> So if there's an interest for very compact printing loop, something like
> this produces the same output:
>
> for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> printf("%02X", buf[i]);
> printf("%02X", buf[i]);
Ok, test-before-post failure, this should be
printf("%02X", buf[2 * i]);
printf("%02X", buf[2 * i + 1]);
> if (1 <= i && i <= 4)
> putchar('-');
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists