| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191017083422.6ab65ce2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:34:22 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kaushalk@...eaurora.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: fix race in perf_trace_buf initialization
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:23:49 +0530
Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 10/15/19 11:47 AM, Prateek Sood wrote:
> > [ 943.034988] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000003106f2003c
> > [ 943.043653] Mem abort info:
> > [ 943.046679] ESR = 0x96000045
> > [ 943.050428] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > [ 943.056643] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > [ 943.060168] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > [ 943.063449] Data abort info:
> > [ 943.066474] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000045
> > [ 943.070856] CM = 0, WnR = 1
> > [ 943.074016] user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp = ffffffc034b9b000
> > [ 943.081446] [0000003106f2003c] pgd=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
> > [ 943.088862] Internal error: Oops: 96000045 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > [ 943.141700] Process syz-executor (pid: 18393, stack limit = 0xffffffc093190000)
> > [ 943.164146] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO)
> > [ 943.169119] pc : __memset+0x20/0x1ac
> > [ 943.172831] lr : memset+0x3c/0x50
> > [ 943.176269] sp : ffffffc09319fc50
> >
> > [ 943.557593] __memset+0x20/0x1ac
> > [ 943.560953] perf_trace_buf_alloc+0x140/0x1a0
> > [ 943.565472] perf_trace_sys_enter+0x158/0x310
> > [ 943.569985] syscall_trace_enter+0x348/0x7c0
> > [ 943.574413] el0_svc_common+0x11c/0x368
> > [ 943.578394] el0_svc_handler+0x12c/0x198
> > [ 943.582459] el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> >
> > In Ramdumps:
> > total_ref_count = 3
> > perf_trace_buf = (
> > 0x0 -> NULL,
> > 0x0 -> NULL,
> > 0x0 -> NULL,
> > 0x0 -> NULL)
> >
> > event_call in perf_trace_sys_enter()
> > event_call = 0xFFFFFF900CB511D8 -> (
> > list = (next = 0xFFFFFF900CB4E2E0, prev = 0xFFFFFF900CB512B0),
> > class = 0xFFFFFF900CDC8308,
> > name = 0xFFFFFF900CDDA1D8,
> > tp = 0xFFFFFF900CDDA1D8,
> > event = (
> > node = (next = 0x0, pprev = 0xFFFFFF900CB80210),
> > list = (next = 0xFFFFFF900CB512E0, prev = 0xFFFFFF900CB4E310),
> > type = 21,
> > funcs = 0xFFFFFF900CB51130),
> > print_fmt = 0xFFFFFF900CB51150,
> > filter = 0x0,
> > mod = 0x0,
> > data = 0x0,
> > flags = 18,
> > perf_refcount = 1,
> > perf_events = 0xFFFFFF8DB8E54158,
> > prog_array = 0x0,
> > perf_perm = 0x0)
> >
> > perf_events added on CPU0
> > (struct hlist_head *)(0xFFFFFF8DB8E54158+__per_cpu_offset[0]) -> (
> > first = 0xFFFFFFC0980FD0E0 -> (
> > next = 0x0,
> > pprev = 0xFFFFFFBEBFD74158))
> >
> > Could you please confirm:
> > 1) the race mentioned below exists or not.
> > 2) if following patch fixes it.
> >
> >
> >> 8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8>8
> >
> > A race condition exists while initialiazing perf_trace_buf from
> > perf_trace_init() and perf_kprobe_init().
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > perf_trace_init()
> > mutex_lock(&event_mutex)
> > perf_trace_event_init()
> > perf_trace_event_reg()
> > total_ref_count == 0
> > buf = alloc_percpu()
> > perf_trace_buf[i] = buf
> > tp_event->class->reg() //fails perf_kprobe_init()
> > goto fail perf_trace_event_init()
> > perf_trace_event_reg()
> > fail:
> > total_ref_count == 0
> >
> > total_ref_count == 0
> > buf = alloc_percpu()
> > perf_trace_buf[i] = buf
> > tp_event->class->reg()
> > total_ref_count++
> >
> > free_percpu(perf_trace_buf[i])
> > perf_trace_buf[i] = NULL
> >
> > Any subsequent call to perf_trace_event_reg() will observe total_ref_count > 0,
> > causing the perf_trace_buf to be NULL always. This can result in perf_trace_buf
> > getting accessed from perf_trace_buf_alloc() without being initialized. Acquiring
> > event_mutex in perf_kprobe_init() before calling perf_trace_event_init() should
> > fix this race.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > index 4629a61..48ee92c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > @@ -272,9 +272,11 @@ int perf_kprobe_init(struct perf_event *p_event, bool is_retprobe)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> > ret = perf_trace_event_init(tp_event, p_event);
> > if (ret)
> > destroy_local_trace_kprobe(tp_event);
> > + mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> > out:
> > kfree(func);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -282,8 +284,10 @@ int perf_kprobe_init(struct perf_event *p_event, bool is_retprobe)
> >
> > void perf_kprobe_destroy(struct perf_event *p_event)
> > {
> > + mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> > perf_trace_event_close(p_event);
> > perf_trace_event_unreg(p_event);
> > + mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
> >
> > destroy_local_trace_kprobe(p_event->tp_event);
> > }
> >
>
> Folks,
>
> Could you please help with this query/patch?
Added Peter Zijlstra who maintains the kernel side of perf.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists