[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR12MB1809562679A0266AF1C43A81F76D0@BN6PR12MB1809.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:56:21 +0000
From: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
To: "RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO"
<Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Mukunda, Vijendar" <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu <Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@....com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: amd: No need PCI-MSI interrupts
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO
> <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 5:33 AM
> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
> Cc: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO
> <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>; Liam Girdwood
> <lgirdwood@...il.com>; Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>; Takashi Iwai
> <tiwai@...e.com>; Mukunda, Vijendar <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>;
> Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu <Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@....com>; Colin Ian
> King <colin.king@...onical.com>; Dan Carpenter
> <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>; moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER /
> DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>; open
> list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: amd: No need PCI-MSI interrupts
>
>
>
> On 11/10/19 3:03 AM, vishnu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Please find my inline comments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vishnu
> >
> > On 01/10/19 10:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 05:23:43PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
> >>
> >>>> ACP-PCI controller driver does not depends msi interrupts.
> >>>> So removed msi related pci functions which have no use and does not
> >>>> impact on existing functionality.
> >>
> >>> In general, however, aren't MSIs preferred to legacy interrupts?
> >>
> >> As I understand it. Or at the very least I'm not aware of any
> >> situation where they're harmful. It'd be good to have a clear
> >> explanation of why we're removing the support.
> >
> > Actually our device is audio device and it does not depends on MSI`s.
> > So we thought to remove it as it has no purpose or meaning to have
> > this code in our audio based ACP-PCI driver.
> >
> >>> Doesn't the driver have to opt into MSI support? As such, won't
> >>> removing this code effectively disable MSI support?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >
> >
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Any updates on this patch.
You are removing functionality from the driver with no rational as to why it's necessary. What's the point of this patch? Does it fix a particular issue? If not, I suggest just dropping it. The hw supports MSIs, why not use them?
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists