linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191016173233.2bd9c9d47f12453c1cb4a9b7@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 17:32:33 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] lib/list-test: add a test for
 the 'list' doubly linked list

On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:48:59 -0700 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:

> Since KUnit is not yet in Linus' branch, though, it probably makes
> sense to put this test into the linux-kselftest/test branch, so that
> there aren't any chances of the list test getting in without the KUnit
> infrastructure. Ultimately, once KUnit is upstream, this shouldn't be
> an issue, but it is probably easier to consolidate things for now.
> Does that sound sensible?

Well, whatever.  I have a note that it's dependent on kunit.