[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191017140841.GA20279@bogus>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:08:41 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: min.guo@...iatek.com
Cc: Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, tony@...mide.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com, Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: musb: Add support for
MediaTek musb controller
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:25:49 +0800, <min.guo@...iatek.com> wrote:
> From: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
>
> This adds support for MediaTek musb controller in
> host, peripheral and otg mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>
> ---
> changes in v7:
> 1. Modify compatible as
> - compatible : should be one of:
> "mediatek,mt2701-musb"
> ...
> followed by "mediatek,mtk-musb"
> 2. Change usb connector child node compatible as "gpio-usb-b-connector"
>
> changes in v6:
> 1. Modify usb connector child node
>
> changes in v5:
> suggested by Rob:
> 1. Modify compatible as
> - compatible : should be one of:
> "mediatek,mt-2701"
> ...
> followed by "mediatek,mtk-musb"
> 2. Add usb connector child node
>
> changes in v4:
> suggested by Sergei:
> 1. String alignment
>
> changes in v3:
> 1. no changes
>
> changes in v2:
> suggested by Bin:
> 1. Modify DRC to DRD
> suggested by Rob:
> 2. Drop the "<soc-model>-musb" in compatible
> 3. Remove phy-names
> 4. Add space after comma in clock-names
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,musb.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/mediatek,musb.txt
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists