[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191017155933.GC1079687@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:59:33 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 68/81] ACPICA: ACPI 6.3: PPTT add additional fields
in Processor Structure Flags
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:59:12AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
> >
> > Commit b5eab512e7cffb2bb37c4b342b5594e9e75fd486 upstream.
>
> So this introduces another format of "upstream" information. So far I
> had this:
>
> ma = re.match(".*Upstream commit ([0-9a-f]*) .*", l)
> ...
> ma = re.match("commit ([0-9a-f]*) upstream[.]*", l)
do a case-insensitive search :)
> I believe this information belongs to the signoff area; it is
> important to know who pushed patch to the upstream and who is pusing
> it to the stable.
>
> Could we just introduce "Upstream: <sha1>" tag and use it? It would
> improve consistency...
It would, I have plans for that, been busy with other stuff...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists