[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191018160852.GA13036@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:08:52 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] soc: fsl: qe: replace spin_event_timeout by
readx_poll_timeout_atomic
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> /* wait for the QE_CR_FLG to clear */
> - ret = spin_event_timeout((ioread32be(&qe_immr->cp.cecr) & QE_CR_FLG) == 0,
> - 100, 0);
> - /* On timeout (e.g. failure), the expression will be false (ret == 0),
> - otherwise it will be true (ret == 1). */
> + ret = readx_poll_timeout_atomic(ioread32be, &qe_immr->cp.cecr, val, (val & QE_CR_FLG) == 0,
This creates an overly long line.
Btw, given how few users of spin_event_timeout we have it might be good
idea to just kill it entirely.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists