[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1571419545-20401-10-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:25:42 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@....com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/12] arm64: traps: Fix inconsistent faulting instruction skipping
Correct skipping of an instruction on AArch32 works a bit
differently from AArch64, mainly due to the different CPSR/PSTATE
semantics.
There have been various attempts to get this right. Currenty
arm64_skip_faulting_instruction() mostly does the right thing, but
does not advance the IT state machine for the AArch32 case.
arm64_compat_skip_faulting_instruction() handles the IT state
machine but is local to traps.c, and porting other code to use it
will make a mess since there are some call sites that apply for
both the compat and native cases.
Since manual instruction skipping implies a trap, it's a relatively
slow path.
So, make arm64_skip_faulting_instruction() handle both compat and
native, and get rid of the arm64_compat_skip_faulting_instruction()
special case.
Fixes: 32a3e635fb0e ("arm64: compat: Add CNTFRQ trap handler")
Fixes: 1f1c014035a8 ("arm64: compat: Add condition code checks and IT advance")
Fixes: 6436beeee572 ("arm64: Fix single stepping in kernel traps")
Fixes: bd35a4adc413 ("arm64: Port SWP/SWPB emulation support from arm")
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
---
**NOTE**
Despite discussions on the v2 series to the effect that the prior
behaviour is not broken, I'm now not so sure:
Taking another look, I now can't track down for example where SWP in an
IT block is specified to be UNPREDICTABLE. I only see e.g., ARM DDI
0487E.a Section 1.8.2 ("F1.8.2 Partial deprecation of IT"), which only
deprecates the affected instructions.
The legacy AArch32 SWP{B} insn is obsoleted by ARMv8, but the whole
point of the armv8_deprecated stuff is to provide some backwards
compatiblity with v7.
So, this looks like it needs a closer look.
I'll leave the Fixes tags for now, so that the archaeology doesn't need
to be repeated if we conclude that this patch really is a fix.
---
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 15e3c4f..44c91d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ void arm64_notify_die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs,
}
}
+static void advance_itstate(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
{
regs->pc += size;
@@ -278,6 +280,9 @@ void arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long size)
*/
if (user_mode(regs))
user_fastforward_single_step(current);
+
+ if (regs->pstate & PSR_MODE32_BIT)
+ advance_itstate(regs);
}
static LIST_HEAD(undef_hook);
@@ -629,19 +634,12 @@ static void advance_itstate(struct pt_regs *regs)
compat_set_it_state(regs, it);
}
-static void arm64_compat_skip_faulting_instruction(struct pt_regs *regs,
- unsigned int sz)
-{
- advance_itstate(regs);
- arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, sz);
-}
-
static void compat_cntfrq_read_handler(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int reg = (esr & ESR_ELx_CP15_32_ISS_RT_MASK) >> ESR_ELx_CP15_32_ISS_RT_SHIFT;
pt_regs_write_reg(regs, reg, arch_timer_get_rate());
- arm64_compat_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
+ arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
}
static const struct sys64_hook cp15_32_hooks[] = {
@@ -661,7 +659,7 @@ static void compat_cntvct_read_handler(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
pt_regs_write_reg(regs, rt, lower_32_bits(val));
pt_regs_write_reg(regs, rt2, upper_32_bits(val));
- arm64_compat_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
+ arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
}
static const struct sys64_hook cp15_64_hooks[] = {
@@ -682,7 +680,7 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_cp15instr(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
* There is no T16 variant of a CP access, so we
* always advance PC by 4 bytes.
*/
- arm64_compat_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
+ arm64_skip_faulting_instruction(regs, 4);
return;
}
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists