[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191018040619.o3qb5fyj4qdevwoe@ltop.local>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 06:06:20 +0200
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] riscv: ensure RISC-V C model definitions are passed
to static analyzers
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:49:25PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Static analysis tools such as sparse don't set the RISC-V C model
> preprocessor directives such as "__riscv_cmodel_medany", set by the C
> compilers. This causes the static analyzers to evaluate different
> preprocessor paths than C compilers would. Fix this by defining the
> appropriate C model macros in the static analyzer command lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Makefile b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> index f5e914210245..0247a90bd4d8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> @@ -47,9 +47,11 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=$(CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET)
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_CMODEL_MEDLOW),y)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mcmodel=medlow
> + CHECKFLAGS += -D__riscv_cmodel_medlow
> endif
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_CMODEL_MEDANY),y)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mcmodel=medany
> + CHECKFLAGS += -D__riscv_cmodel_medany
I can teach sparse about this in the following days.
-- Luc Van Oostenryck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists