linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:24:46 -0600
From:   shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v2] lib/list-test: add a test for the
 'list' doubly linked list

On 10/16/19 6:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:48:59 -0700 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Since KUnit is not yet in Linus' branch, though, it probably makes
>> sense to put this test into the linux-kselftest/test branch, so that
>> there aren't any chances of the list test getting in without the KUnit
>> infrastructure. Ultimately, once KUnit is upstream, this shouldn't be
>> an issue, but it is probably easier to consolidate things for now.
>> Does that sound sensible?
> 
> Well, whatever.  I have a note that it's dependent on kunit.
> 
David and Andrew,

I have a few comments on CONFIG naming to be consistent with the other
kunit ext4 test and a couple of other comments that would requite v3.

I would like to bundle these in the pull request with KUnit framework.
Hope that is okay with you.

thanks,
-- Shuah