[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebd87597-9a1e-7d16-2dfb-5bd421383816@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:45:56 -0600
From: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jaswinder.singh@...aro.org, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX PATCH 0/5] selftests: Fixes for 32bit arch
On 10/7/19 9:10 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some patches to fix some warnings/issues on 32bit arch
> (e.g. arm).
>
> When I built the ksefltest on arm, I hit some 32bit related warnings.
> Here are the patches to fix those issues.
>
>
> - [1/5] va_max was set 2^32 even on 32bit arch. This can make
> va_max == 0 and always fail. Make it 3GB on 32bit.
> - [2/5] Some VM tests requires 64bit user space, which should
> not run on 32bit arch.
> - [3/5] For counting the size of large file, we should use
> size_t instead of unsinged long.
> - [4/5] Gcc warns printf format for size_t and int64_t on
> 32bit arch. Use %llu and cast it.
> - [5/5] Gcc warns __u64 and pointer type castings. It should
> once translated to unsigned long.
>
> Thank you,
>
> ---
>
> Masami Hiramatsu (5):
> selftests: proc: Make va_max 3GB on 32bit arch
> selftests: vm: Build/Run 64bit tests only on 64bit arch
> selftests: net: Use size_t and ssize_t for counting file size
> selftests: net: Fix printf format warnings on arm
> selftests: sync: Fix cast warnings on arm
>
>
> tools/testing/selftests/net/so_txtime.c | 4 ++--
> tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_mmap.c | 8 ++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c | 3 ++-
> tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench_tx.c | 3 ++-
> .../selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/sync/sync.c | 6 +++---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 5 +++++
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 10 ++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>
Hi Masami,
I would love to pull these in. But looks like these are spread out
across several sub-systems.
There are some comments on vm patch. Do you mind sending them again
cc'ing everybody on the cover-letter. Looks like these are getting
lost in the noise.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists