[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191018031850.48498-17-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:18:34 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 17/33] oprofile: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
As said in commit f2c2cbcc35d4 ("powerpc: Use pr_warn instead of
pr_warning"), removing pr_warning so all logging messages use a
consistent <prefix>_warn style. Let's do it.
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
---
drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c b/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c
index 4b150a754890..98a63a5f8763 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ static void op_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
if (id != num_counters)
oprofile_add_sample(regs, id);
else
- pr_warning("oprofile: ignoring spurious overflow "
- "on cpu %u\n", cpu);
+ pr_warn("oprofile: ignoring spurious overflow on cpu %u\n",
+ cpu);
}
/*
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static int op_create_counter(int cpu, int event)
if (pevent->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
perf_event_release_kernel(pevent);
- pr_warning("oprofile: failed to enable event %d "
- "on CPU %d\n", event, cpu);
+ pr_warn("oprofile: failed to enable event %d on CPU %d\n",
+ event, cpu);
return -EBUSY;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists