linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] riscv: ensure RISC-V C model definitions are passed to static analyzers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191018052507.l2dkdam2lam6ul2j@ltop.local>
Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 07:25:08 +0200
From:   Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] riscv: ensure RISC-V C model definitions are passed
 to static analyzers

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:39:29PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:49:25PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
....
> > >  ifeq ($(CONFIG_CMODEL_MEDANY),y)
> > >  	KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mcmodel=medany
> > > +	CHECKFLAGS += -D__riscv_cmodel_medany
> > 
> > I can teach sparse about this in the following days.
> 
> That would be great.  Would you be willing to follow up with me via E-mail 
> or mailing list post when it's fixed?  If so, then in the meantime, I'll 
> just drop this patch.

For sure.
-- Luc