[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfb07352-877b-0ed2-ea1b-5a4885cd740b@web.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:30:42 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>
Subject: iommu/exynos: Checking a device_link_add() call in
exynos_iommu_add_device()
Hello,
I tried another script for the semantic patch language out.
This source code analysis approach points out that the implementation
of the function “exynos_iommu_add_device” contains still
an unchecked call of the function “device_link_add”.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c?id=0e2adab6cf285c41e825b6c74a3aa61324d1132c#n1253
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4-rc2/source/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c#L1253
How do you think about to improve it?
* Which error code would you like to return for a failed
device link addition at this place?
* Will it be needed to delete any links as exception handling?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists