lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191018080338.vbgnrt3i6epkrx3u@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:33:38 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: flush any pending policy update work scheduled
 before freeing

On 18-10-19, 09:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, the policy is going away, so the governor has been stopped for
> it already.  Even if the limit is updated, it will not be used anyway,
> so why bother with updating it?

The hardware will be programmed to run on that frequency before the
policy exits, so I will say it will be used and the constraint will be
satisfied. And so I had that view.

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ