[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62eb5232-1e4d-22cf-0026-3e37ac06f3a3@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:15:47 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 16/16] mm, soft-offline: convert parameter to pfn
On 17.10.19 16:21, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
>
> Currently soft_offline_page() receives struct page, and its sibling
> memory_failure() receives pfn. This discrepancy looks weird and makes
> precheck on pfn validity tricky. So let's align them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/base/memory.c | 7 +------
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
> mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
> mm/memory-failure.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
> index b3cae2eb1c4f..b510b4d176c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
> @@ -538,12 +538,7 @@ static ssize_t soft_offline_page_store(struct device *dev,
> if (kstrtoull(buf, 0, &pfn) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> pfn >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
> - if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> - return -ENXIO;
> - /* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
> - if (!pfn_to_online_page(pfn))
> - return -EIO;
> - ret = soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> + ret = soft_offline_page(pfn);
> return ret == 0 ? count : ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 0f80a1ce4e86..40722854d357 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2791,7 +2791,7 @@ extern int sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
> extern int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery;
> extern void shake_page(struct page *p, int access);
> extern atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly;
> -extern int soft_offline_page(struct page *page);
> +extern int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn);
>
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 9ca48345ce45..f83b7d4c68c1 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
> if (behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) {
> pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
> pfn, start);
> - ret = soft_offline_page(page);
> + ret = soft_offline_page(pfn);
> } else {
> pr_info("Injecting memory failure for pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
> pfn, start);
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index c038896bedf0..bfecb61fc064 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!gotten)
> break;
> if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE)
> - soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(entry.pfn));
> + soft_offline_page(entry.pfn);
> else
> memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
> }
> @@ -1834,7 +1834,7 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
>
> /**
> * soft_offline_page - Soft offline a page.
> - * @page: page to offline
> + * @pfn: pfn to soft-offline
> *
> * Returns 0 on success, otherwise negated errno.
> *
> @@ -1853,16 +1853,17 @@ static int soft_offline_free_page(struct page *page)
> * This is not a 100% solution for all memory, but tries to be
> * ``good enough'' for the majority of memory.
> */
> -int soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
> +int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> int ret;
> - unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> + struct page *page;
>
> - if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
> - pr_debug_ratelimited("soft_offline: %#lx page is device page\n",
> - pfn);
> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> + return -ENXIO;
> + /* Only online pages can be soft-offlined (esp., not ZONE_DEVICE). */
> + page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
> + if (!page)
> return -EIO;
> - }
>
> if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
> pr_info("soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned\n", pfn);
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists