[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191018091213.k6bka3tajy2vez6l@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:12:15 +0000
From: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>
To: "james qian wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@....com>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@....com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@....com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [RFC,3/3] drm/komeda: Allow non-component drm_bridge only
endpoints
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:57:05AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
>
> Hi Brian:
>
> Can this convince you to fully swap to bridge ?
Not until those patches materialise and land, no :-)
>
> Actually even there is no fix, we won't real encounter such rmmod problem,
> since we always build the bridge/tda998 (by Y) into the image.
>
If you say so. I think the folks here like having drm as a module to
make it easy to patch things without a reboot.
-Brian
> Thanks
> James
> > --
> > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists