lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd2SMERjtvNumxAF1HSp8GSThmcyx96zkFzUXKwnD5d2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:34:52 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: pxa2xx: Add missed security checks

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:59 AM Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com> wrote:
>
> pxa2xx_spi_init_pdata misses checks for devm_clk_get and
> platform_get_irq.
> Add checks for them to fix the bugs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> index bb6a14d1ab0f..2e73d75a6ac5 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -1565,7 +1565,13 @@ pxa2xx_spi_init_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  #endif
>
>         ssp->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +       if (IS_ERR(ssp->clk))
> +               return NULL;
> +
>         ssp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +       if (ssp->irq < 0)
> +               return NULL;

I'm not sure they are mandatory for all platforms.
To be on the safe side, you simple need to add _optional() to the both
call along with above change.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ