linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PNP: fix unintended sign extension on left shifts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:15:26 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNP: fix unintended sign extension on left shifts

On Monday, October 14, 2019 3:16:08 PM CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Shifting a u8 left will cause the value to be promoted to an integer. If
> the top bit of the u8 is set then the following conversion to a 64 bit
> resource_size_t will sign extend the value causing the upper 32 bits
> to be set in the result.
> 
> Fix this by casting the u8 value to a resource_size_t before the shift.
> Original commit is pre-git history.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c b/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> index 179b737280e1..c947b1673041 100644
> --- a/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> @@ -511,10 +511,14 @@ static void __init isapnp_parse_mem32_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev,
>  	unsigned char flags;
>  
>  	isapnp_peek(tmp, size);
> -	min = (tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) | (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> -	max = (tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) | (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> -	align = (tmp[12] << 24) | (tmp[11] << 16) | (tmp[10] << 8) | tmp[9];
> -	len = (tmp[16] << 24) | (tmp[15] << 16) | (tmp[14] << 8) | tmp[13];
> +	min = ((resource_size_t)tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) |
> +              (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> +	max = ((resource_size_t)tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) |
> +              (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> +	align = ((resource_size_t)tmp[12] << 24) | (tmp[11] << 16) |
> +              (tmp[10] << 8) | tmp[9];
> +	len = ((resource_size_t)tmp[16] << 24) | (tmp[15] << 16) |
> +              (tmp[14] << 8) | tmp[13];
>  	flags = tmp[0];
>  	pnp_register_mem_resource(dev, option_flags,
>  				  min, max, align, len, flags);
> @@ -532,8 +536,10 @@ static void __init isapnp_parse_fixed_mem32_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev,
>  	unsigned char flags;
>  
>  	isapnp_peek(tmp, size);
> -	base = (tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) | (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> -	len = (tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) | (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> +	base = ((resource_size_t)tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) |
> +	       (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> +	len = ((resource_size_t)tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) |
> +              (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
>  	flags = tmp[0];
>  	pnp_register_mem_resource(dev, option_flags, base, base, 0, len, flags);
>  }
> 

Can you please respin this with a CC to linux-acpi?