[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191018162007.31631039.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 16:20:07 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@...dia.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, tiwei.bie@...el.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
maxime.coquelin@...hat.com, cunming.liang@...el.com,
zhihong.wang@...el.com, rob.miller@...adcom.com,
xiao.w.wang@...el.com, haotian.wang@...ive.com,
zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
farman@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, sebott@...ux.ibm.com,
oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com,
freude@...ux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@...el.com, idos@...lanox.com,
eperezma@...hat.com, lulu@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
christophe.de.dinechin@...il.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
stefanha@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/6] virtio: introduce a mdev based transport
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 18:48:35 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> This patch introduces a new mdev transport for virtio. This is used to
> use kernel virtio driver to drive the mediated device that is capable
> of populating virtqueue directly.
>
> A new virtio-mdev driver will be registered to the mdev bus, when a
> new virtio-mdev device is probed, it will register the device with
> mdev based config ops. This means it is a software transport between
> mdev driver and mdev device. The transport was implemented through
> device specific ops which is a part of mdev_parent_ops now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mdev.c | 409 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 417 insertions(+)
(...)
> +static int virtio_mdev_probe(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mdev_device *mdev = mdev_from_dev(dev);
> + const struct virtio_mdev_device_ops *ops = mdev_get_dev_ops(mdev);
> + struct virtio_mdev_device *vm_dev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + vm_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*vm_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vm_dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + vm_dev->vdev.dev.parent = dev;
> + vm_dev->vdev.dev.release = virtio_mdev_release_dev;
> + vm_dev->vdev.config = &virtio_mdev_config_ops;
> + vm_dev->mdev = mdev;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vm_dev->virtqueues);
> + spin_lock_init(&vm_dev->lock);
> +
> + vm_dev->version = ops->get_mdev_features(mdev);
> + if (vm_dev->version != VIRTIO_MDEV_F_VERSION_1) {
> + dev_err(dev, "VIRTIO_MDEV_F_VERSION_1 is mandatory\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
Hm, so how is that mdev features interface supposed to work? If
VIRTIO_MDEV_F_VERSION_1 is a bit, I would expect this code to test for
its presence, and not for identity.
What will happen if we come up with a version 2? If this is backwards
compatible, will both version 2 and version 1 be set?
> +
> + vm_dev->vdev.id.device = ops->get_device_id(mdev);
> + if (vm_dev->vdev.id.device == 0)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + vm_dev->vdev.id.vendor = ops->get_vendor_id(mdev);
> + rc = register_virtio_device(&vm_dev->vdev);
> + if (rc)
> + put_device(dev);
> + else
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, vm_dev);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
(...)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists