[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2207cdd0-d44c-1c12-001a-f93203d3ceca@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:41:05 -0500
From: "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: fix "gfp_t" format for synthetic events
On 10/17/2019 8:20 PM, Zhengjun Xing wrote:
> In the format of synthetic events, the "gfp_t" is shown as "signed:1",
> but in fact the "gfp_t" is "unsigned", should be shown as "signed:0".
>
> The issue can be reproduced by the following commands:
>
> echo 'memlatency u64 lat; unsigned int order; gfp_t gfp_flags; int migratetype' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/synthetic_events
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/synthetic/memlatency/format
>
> name: memlatency
> ID: 2233
> format:
> field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
> field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
>
> field:u64 lat; offset:8; size:8; signed:0;
> field:unsigned int order; offset:16; size:4; signed:0;
> field:gfp_t gfp_flags; offset:24; size:4; signed:1;
> field:int migratetype; offset:32; size:4; signed:1;
>
> print fmt: "lat=%llu, order=%u, gfp_flags=%x, migratetype=%d", REC->lat, REC->order, REC->gfp_flags, REC->migratetype
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 57648c5aa679..7482a1466ebf 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -679,6 +679,8 @@ static bool synth_field_signed(char *type)
> {
> if (str_has_prefix(type, "u"))
> return false;
> + if (strcmp(type, "gfp_t") == 0)
> + return false;
>
> return true;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists