lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 21:25:49 -0700
From:   Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
        "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
        Austin Palmer <austinp@...vesoftware.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] HID: logitech-hidpp: do all FF cleanup in hidpp_ff_destroy()

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:31 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: ff21a635dd1a9 HID: logitech-hidpp: Force feedback support for the Logitech G920.
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.3.6, v4.19.79, v4.14.149, v4.9.196.
>
> v5.3.6: Build OK!
> v4.19.79: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     91cf9a98ae412 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: make .probe usbhid capable")
>
> v4.14.149: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     91cf9a98ae412 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: make .probe usbhid capable")
>
> v4.9.196: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     6bd4e65d521f9 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: remove HIDPP_QUIRK_CONNECT_EVENTS")
>     91cf9a98ae412 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: make .probe usbhid capable")
>     a4bf6153b3177 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: add a sysfs file to tell we support power_supply")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?

Looks like I'd have to mark this one as 5.2+ as well. Please disregard
this series in favor of v3 that will be sent out shortly.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ