linux-kernel - Re: email as a bona fide git transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191018155408.dk4tsjrne42ufpvv@LykOS.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:54:09 -0400
From:   Santiago Torres Arias <santiago@....edu>
To:     Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
        Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Eric Wong <e@...24.org>
Subject: Re: email as a bona fide git transport

> Seeing how large this signature is, I have to admit that I am partial to
> Konstantin's suggestion of using minisign. This seems like something
> that could be added to git as an alternative to gpg without too much
> trouble, I think.
> 
> 

I wonder how big the pgp payload would be with ed25519 as the underlying
algorithm. AFAICT, the payload of a minisign signature vs a signature
packet have almost the same fields...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)