linux-kernel - Re: coccinelle: api/devm_platform_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <693a3b68-a0f1-81fe-40ce-2b6ba189450c@web.de>
Date:   Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:35:49 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: coccinelle: api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource: remove useless
 script

> I think part of the issue is that the script reports a WARNING

How much does this information influence really the stress tolerance
and change resistance (or acceptance) for the presented collateral evolution?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource.cocci

> for something that is definitely correct code,

Can related software improvement possibilities be taken into account
again under other circumstances?

> and could instead be simply toned down.

Does this view mean that the mentioned script for the semantic patch language
should get another chance for integration?

> Anyway, FWIW:
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>

Would you like to share any more constructive feedback?

Will similar source file mass updates be better picked up
by other well-known Linux developers?

Regards,
Markus