Message-ID: <20191019160513.GA17631@Mani-XPS-13-9360>
Date:   Sat, 19 Oct 2019 21:35:13 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-unisoc@...ts.infradead.org,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: Add RDA Micro GPIO controller support

Hi Linus,

Thanks for the review! Please see comments inline.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:41:32PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Manivannan!
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:30 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > Add support for GPIO controller from RDA Micro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> 
> Please use a little bit more verbose commit message, who
> made this hardware and what is it for. If you know!
> 

okay.

> > +config GPIO_RDA
> > +       bool "RDA Micro GPIO controller support"
> > +       depends on ARCH_RDA || COMPILE_TEST
> > +       depends on OF_GPIO
> > +       select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> 
> select GPIO_GENERIC
> 

hmm.. I don't think this driver can use it. Please see the justification
below.

> > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> 
> Do you need this or just <linux/bits.h>?
> 

I need this for for_each_set_bit() macro.

> > +#define RDA_GPIO_OEN_VAL               0x00
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_OEN_SET_OUT           0x04
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_OEN_SET_IN            0x08
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_VAL                   0x0c
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_SET                   0x10
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_CLR                   0x14
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_INT_CTRL_SET          0x18
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_INT_CTRL_CLR          0x1c
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_INT_CLR               0x20
> > +#define RDA_GPIO_INT_STATUS            0x24
> 
> This is a very clear cut MMIO GPIO so use GPIO_GENERIC with this
> hardware.
> 

So, I'd be happy to use gpio-mmio driver if applicable. In fact, I looked into
that while starting to write this driver since most of the `set*` APIs are
like dups. But one thing which blocked me was, `gpio_get` API.

As you can see in this driver, there are 2 separate registers needs to be
read in order to get the value. RDA_GPIO_VAL needs to be read when the pin
is in input state and RDA_GPIO_SET needs to be read when the pin is in output
state.

The MMIO driver relies on a single `dat` register to read the GPIO state and
this won't fit for this driver and hence my justification for not using it.

> > +static void rda_gpio_update(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> > +                           u16 reg, int val)
> 
> Maybe keep this if it saves code from the IRQ callbacks,
> inline it to register writes if it doesn't get called much.
> 

It is being called from multiple places, so I'd like to keep it as a normal
function.

> > +static int rda_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> > +static int rda_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > +                                    unsigned int offset, int value)
> > +static int rda_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> > +static void rda_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
> 
> This can all be replaces by select GPIO_GENERIC and passing
> the right offsets into bgpio_init(). Look at for example
> gpio-ftgpio010.c and the documentation for bgpio_init()
> in gpio-mmio.c for help.
> 
> This will also implement get/set_multiple for you for
> free!
> 
> > +static void rda_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> > +static void rda_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *data)
> 
> Looks good
> 
> > +static int rda_gpio_set_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, u32 offset,
> > +                           unsigned int flow_type)
> 
> Maybe _setup_irq()? Not sure, just that the name doesn't
> obviously imply how it is used as it is called from two
> places.
> 

Well, this routine sets the irq_type. But it has multiple usecase.
Like, it is being used to unmask as irq and also to set irq type.
So to be in a equillibrium state, I went for rda_gpio_set_irq().

> The rest of the IRQ code looks good!
> 
> > +static int rda_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +       struct gpio_irq_chip *irq_chip;
> 
> Since irq_chip is the name of a struct in the kernel I usually
> just call this "girq" as in "GPIO irq chip".
> 

Ah, a name change again... will do ;-)

> > +       struct rda_gpio *rda_gpio;
> > +       u32 ngpios;
> > +       int ret;
> 
> Create a struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; helper variable
> to make the following code easier to read. (The pointer
> &pdev->dev is used in many places...)
> 

okay.

> > +       /*
> > +        * Not all ports have interrupt capability. For instance, on
> > +        * RDA8810PL, GPIOC doesn't support interrupt. So we must handle
> > +        * those also.
> > +        */
> > +       rda_gpio->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +
> > +       rda_gpio->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(rda_gpio->base))
> > +               return PTR_ERR(rda_gpio->base);
> > +
> > +       spin_lock_init(&rda_gpio->lock);
> > +
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.ngpio = ngpios;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.base = -1;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.of_node = np;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.get = rda_gpio_get;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.set = rda_gpio_set;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.direction_input = rda_gpio_direction_input;
> > +       rda_gpio->chip.direction_output = rda_gpio_direction_output;
> > +
> > +       if (rda_gpio->irq >= 0) {
> > +               rda_gpio->irq_chip.name = "rda-gpio",
> > +               rda_gpio->irq_chip.irq_ack = rda_gpio_irq_ack,
> > +               rda_gpio->irq_chip.irq_mask = rda_gpio_irq_mask,
> > +               rda_gpio->irq_chip.irq_unmask = rda_gpio_irq_unmask,
> > +               rda_gpio->irq_chip.irq_set_type = rda_gpio_irq_set_type,
> > +               rda_gpio->irq_chip.flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> > +
> > +               irq_chip = &rda_gpio->chip.irq;
> > +               irq_chip->chip = &rda_gpio->irq_chip;
> > +               irq_chip->handler = handle_bad_irq;
> > +               irq_chip->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> > +               irq_chip->parent_handler = rda_gpio_irq_handler;
> > +               irq_chip->parent_handler_data = rda_gpio;
> > +               irq_chip->num_parents = 1;
> > +               irq_chip->parents = &rda_gpio->irq;
> 
> That works but ... please devm_kzalloc() like the other drivers
> do:
> 
> girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*girq->parents),
>                                      GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!girq->parents) {
>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
> (...)
> 
> Unless you have a real good reason to optimize it. I just
> want it to follow the pattern since I want to minimize
> cognitive stress for the maintainers. (Me.)
> 

no issues for me, will do.

Thanks,
Mani

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists