| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1571508377-23603-8-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:06:16 -0400
From: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@...ula.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@...ibm.com>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 7/8] ima: check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig
Asymmetric private keys are used to sign multiple files. The kernel
currently support checking against blacklisted keys. However, if the
public key is blacklisted, any file signed by the blacklisted key will
automatically fail signature verification. We might not want to blacklist
all the files signed by a particular key, but just a single file.
Blacklisting the public key is not fine enough granularity.
This patch adds support for checking against the blacklisted hash of the
file based on the IMA policy. The blacklisted hash is the file hash
without the appended signature. Defined is a new policy option
"appraise_flag=check_blacklist".
Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 1 +
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 8 +++++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 12 +++++++----
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 10 +++++++--
security/integrity/integrity.h | 1 +
6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
index 29ebe9afdac4..4c97afcc0f3c 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Description:
lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=]
[obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]]
option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio]
+ [appraise_flag=[check_blacklist]]
base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][CREDS_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK]
[FIRMWARE_CHECK]
[KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK]
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index a65772ffa427..df4ca482fb53 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v);
#define IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC 0x40
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE
+int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
+ const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr);
int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
@@ -271,6 +273,12 @@ int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry,
struct evm_ima_xattr_data **xattr_value);
#else
+static inline int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
+ const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
struct file *file,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 136ae4e0ee92..7a002b08dde8 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/magic.h>
#include <linux/ima.h>
#include <linux/evm.h>
+#include <keys/system_keyring.h>
#include "ima.h"
@@ -303,6 +304,36 @@ static int modsig_verify(enum ima_hooks func, const struct modsig *modsig,
return rc;
}
+/*
+ * ima_blacklist_measurement - Checks whether the binary is blacklisted. If
+ * yes, then adds the hash of the blacklisted binary to the measurement list.
+ *
+ * Returns -EPERM if the hash is blacklisted.
+ */
+int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
+ const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr)
+{
+ enum hash_algo hash_algo;
+ const u8 *digest = NULL;
+ u32 digestsize = 0;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ if (!(iint->flags & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED && modsig) {
+ ima_get_modsig_digest(modsig, &hash_algo, &digest, &digestsize);
+
+ rc = is_binary_blacklisted(digest, digestsize);
+ if ((rc == -EPERM) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE))
+ process_buffer_measurement(digest, digestsize,
+ "blacklisted-hash", NONE,
+ pcr);
+ }
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
/*
* ima_appraise_measurement - appraise file measurement
*
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index fe0b704ffdeb..13a0d64580ef 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -335,10 +335,14 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig, pcr,
template_desc);
if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) {
- inode_lock(inode);
- rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname,
- xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig);
- inode_unlock(inode);
+ rc = ima_check_blacklist(iint, modsig, pcr);
+ if (rc != -EPERM) {
+ inode_lock(inode);
+ rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file,
+ pathname, xattr_value,
+ xattr_len, modsig);
+ inode_unlock(inode);
+ }
if (!rc)
rc = mmap_violation_check(func, file, &pathbuf,
&pathname, filename);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 5380aca2b351..bfaae7a8443a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -765,8 +765,8 @@ enum {
Opt_fsuuid, Opt_uid_eq, Opt_euid_eq, Opt_fowner_eq,
Opt_uid_gt, Opt_euid_gt, Opt_fowner_gt,
Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt,
- Opt_appraise_type, Opt_permit_directio,
- Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_err
+ Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag,
+ Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_err
};
static const match_table_t policy_tokens = {
@@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = {
{Opt_euid_lt, "euid<%s"},
{Opt_fowner_lt, "fowner<%s"},
{Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
+ {Opt_appraise_flag, "appraise_flag=%s"},
{Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"},
{Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"},
{Opt_template, "template=%s"},
@@ -1172,6 +1173,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
else
result = -EINVAL;
break;
+ case Opt_appraise_flag:
+ ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_flag", args[0].from);
+ if (strstr(args[0].from, "blacklist"))
+ entry->flags |= IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST;
+ break;
case Opt_permit_directio:
entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO;
break;
diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
index d9323d31a3a8..73fc286834d7 100644
--- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
+++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG 0x08000000
#define IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS 0x10000000
#define IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED 0x20000000
+#define IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST 0x40000000
#define IMA_DO_MASK (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \
IMA_HASH | IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists