[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83dcacc2-a820-fe63-a1b9-1809e8f14f2f@web.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 16:16:19 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: Fix use-after-free in aa_audit_rule_init
> … But after this release the the return statement
> tries to access the label field of the rule which results in
> use-after-free. Before releaseing the rule, copy errNo and return it
> after releasing rule.
Please avoid a duplicate word and a typo in this change description.
…
> +++ b/security/apparmor/audit.c
…
> @@ -197,8 +198,9 @@ int aa_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **vrule)
> rule->label = aa_label_parse(&root_ns->unconfined->label, rulestr,
> GFP_KERNEL, true, false);
> if (IS_ERR(rule->label)) {
> + err = rule->label;
How do you think about to define the added local variable in this if branch directly?
+ int err = rule->label;
> aa_audit_rule_free(rule);
> - return PTR_ERR(rule->label);
> + return PTR_ERR(err);
> }
>
> *vrule = rule;
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists