[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191020203352.rh3n6qpagiyift7d@earth.universe>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 22:33:52 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] Convert all btwilink users to hci_ll and drop
btwilink
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:31:16AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> [191003 06:42]:
> > This moves the remaining users of btwilink to the "new" serdev based hci_ll
> > driver and drops the btwilink driver afterwards. The patches were only compile
> > tested by me, but Enric tested the IGEP platform and Adam will test the LogicPD
> > platform.
> >
> > I kept the TI_ST driver for now, since I plan to send a second patchset for the
> > FM radio driver. Once the FM driver has been converted to also use hci_ll, we
> > can remove TI_ST completly.
> >
> > My suggestion is for the patch handling is, that everything simply goes through
> > Tony's tree.
>
> Sounds good to me, good to see kim gone with patch 3/4 :)
>
> Marcel, care to ack the old driver removal patch?
Looks like Marcel missed the extra messages and merged the 4th
patch, so I guess you can just merge patches 1-3. Technically that
might lead to temporarily missing BT support on those two devices
when the BT tree is merged before ARM tree during the merge window.
Not a big issue I guess.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists