[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191020062816.GE1669@tuxbook-pro>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 23:28:16 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm_serial: Fix flow control
On Sat 19 Oct 14:06 PDT 2019, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> hci_qca interfaces to the wcn3990 via a uart_dm on the msm8998 mtp and
> Lenovo Miix 630 laptop. As part of initializing the wcn3990, hci_qca
> disables flow, configures the uart baudrate, and then reenables flow - at
> which point an event is expected to be received over the uart from the
> wcn3990. It is observed that this event comes after the baudrate change
> but before hci_qca re-enables flow. This is unexpected, and is a result of
> msm_reset() being broken.
>
> According to the uart_dm hardware documentation, it is recommended that
> automatic hardware flow control be enabled by setting RX_RDY_CTL. Auto
> hw flow control will manage RFR based on the configured watermark. When
> there is space to receive data, the hw will assert RFR. When the watermark
> is hit, the hw will de-assert RFR.
>
> The hardware documentation indicates that RFR can me manually managed via
> CR when RX_RDY_CTL is not set. SET_RFR asserts RFR, and RESET_RFR
> de-asserts RFR.
>
> msm_reset() is broken because after resetting the hardware, it
> unconditionally asserts RFR via SET_RFR. This enables flow regardless of
> the current configuration, and would undo a previous flow disable
> operation. It should instead de-assert RFR via RESET_RFR to block flow
> until the hardware is reconfigured. msm_serial should rely on the client
> to specify that flow should be enabled, either via mctrl() or the termios
> structure, and only assert RFR in response to those triggers.
>
I traced msm_reset() and msm_set_mctrl() and I get the following:
swapper/0-1 [000] d..1 3.091726: msm_set_mctrl: msm_set_mctrl() reset rfr
swapper/0-1 [000] d..1 3.117046: msm_set_mctrl: msm_set_mctrl() reset rfr
swapper/0-1 [000] d..1 3.125484: msm_set_termios: msm_reset() set rfr
swapper/0-1 [003] d..1 4.491430: msm_set_termios: msm_reset() set rfr
swapper/0-1 [003] d..1 4.491733: msm_set_mctrl: msm_set_mctrl() auto rfr
login-313 [001] d..1 78.010785: msm_set_mctrl: msm_set_mctrl() reset rfr
login-313 [001] d..1 78.011007: msm_set_termios: msm_reset() set rfr
login-313 [001] d..1 78.011021: msm_set_mctrl: msm_set_mctrl() auto rfr
login-313 [001] d..1 78.063330: msm_set_termios: msm_reset() set rfr
login-313 [001] d..1 78.063641: msm_set_termios: msm_reset() set rfr
So while your change does make sense for BT, wouldn't this mean that
with your patch and a 4-pin UART for the console I would end this dance
with receive flow blocked?
Regards,
Bjorn
> Fixes: 04896a77a97b ("msm_serial: serial driver for MSM7K onboard serial peripheral.")
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> index 3657a24913fc..aedabf7646f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static void msm_reset(struct uart_port *port)
> msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_RESET_ERR, UART_CR);
> msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_RESET_BREAK_INT, UART_CR);
> msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_RESET_CTS, UART_CR);
> - msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_SET_RFR, UART_CR);
> + msm_write(port, UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RFR, UART_CR);
>
> /* Disable DM modes */
> if (msm_port->is_uartdm)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists