linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ae9a840-d5b6-ccd6-8481-d43665b4411b@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:43:42 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     Lei Wang <leiwang_git@...look.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "hangl@...rosoft.com" <hangl@...rosoft.com>,
        "lewan@...rosoft.com" <lewan@...rosoft.com>,
        "ruizhao@...rosoft.com" <ruizhao@...rosoft.com>,
        "scott.branden@...adcom.com" <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
        "yuqing.shen@...adcom.com" <yuqing.shen@...adcom.com>,
        "ray.jui@...adcom.com" <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt

Hi Lei,

On 18/10/2019 21:08, Lei Wang wrote:
> This thread hasn't got traction from DT owners.

It looks like your patches didn't make it to the mailing list:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/BY5PR04MB6599EAA659A53B2331CB812586890@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com

You can search on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/, I can only see the replies from the
people who received it directly.

I can't see anything obvious in the headers that would cause it to get rejected. Did you
get any bounces/errors from the list?

Depending on how the DT folk work, this may be why you haven't had a response yet. Tools
like patchwork will depend on the message reaching the list.

> James did give ACK before.
> Should that be good enough?

Nope! You need someone from the maintainer's entry for those files to review it.
I gave my R-B as what you'd done made sense from the TRM and the driver. The DT folk will
have a wider view and may have some advice.

Thanks,

James