[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191021201819.GK1797@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:18:19 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf cs-etm: Fix definition of macro TO_CS_QUEUE_NR
Em Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:42:21AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:48, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Macro TO_CS_QUEUE_NR definition has a typo, which uses 'trace_id_chan'
> > as its parameter, this doesn't match with its definition body which uses
> > 'trace_chan_id'. So renames the parameter to 'trace_chan_id'.
> >
> > It's luck to have a local variable 'trace_chan_id' in the function
> > cs_etm__setup_queue(), even we wrongly define the macro TO_CS_QUEUE_NR,
> > the local variable 'trace_chan_id' is used rather than the macro's
> > parameter 'trace_id_chan'; so the compiler doesn't complain for this
> > before.
> >
> > After renaming the parameter, it leads to a compiling error due
> > cs_etm__setup_queue() has no variable 'trace_id_chan'. This patch uses
> > the variable 'trace_chan_id' for the macro so that fixes the compiling
> > error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > index 4ba0f871f086..f5f855fff412 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int cs_etm__decode_data_block(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq);
> > * encode the etm queue number as the upper 16 bit and the channel as
> > * the lower 16 bit.
> > */
> > -#define TO_CS_QUEUE_NR(queue_nr, trace_id_chan) \
> > +#define TO_CS_QUEUE_NR(queue_nr, trace_chan_id) \
> > (queue_nr << 16 | trace_chan_id)
> > #define TO_QUEUE_NR(cs_queue_nr) (cs_queue_nr >> 16)
> > #define TO_TRACE_CHAN_ID(cs_queue_nr) (cs_queue_nr & 0x0000ffff)
> > @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int cs_etm__setup_queue(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm,
> > * Note that packets decoded above are still in the traceID's packet
> > * queue and will be processed in cs_etm__process_queues().
> > */
> > - cs_queue_nr = TO_CS_QUEUE_NR(queue_nr, trace_id_chan);
> > + cs_queue_nr = TO_CS_QUEUE_NR(queue_nr, trace_chan_id);
> > ret = auxtrace_heap__add(&etm->heap, cs_queue_nr, timestamp);
> > out:
> > return ret;
>
> Really good catch - Arnaldo please consider.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists