[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910212312520.2078@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:29:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, luto@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc/32: Switch VDSO to C implementation.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This is a tentative to switch powerpc/32 vdso to generic C implementation.
> It will likely not work on 64 bits or even build properly at the moment.
>
> powerpc is a bit special for VDSO as well as system calls in the
> way that it requires setting CR SO bit which cannot be done in C.
> Therefore, entry/exit and fallback needs to be performed in ASM.
>
> To allow that, C fallbacks just return -1 and the ASM entry point
> performs the system call when the C function returns -1.
>
> The performance is rather disappoiting. That's most likely all
> calculation in the C implementation are based on 64 bits math and
> converted to 32 bits at the very end. I guess C implementation should
> use 32 bits math like the assembly VDSO does as of today.
> gettimeofday: vdso: 750 nsec/call
>
> gettimeofday: vdso: 1533 nsec/call
The only real 64bit math which can matter is the 64bit * 32bit multiply,
i.e.
static __always_inline
u64 vdso_calc_delta(u64 cycles, u64 last, u64 mask, u32 mult)
{
return ((cycles - last) & mask) * mult;
}
Everything else is trivial add/sub/shift, which should be roughly the same
in ASM.
Can you try to replace that with:
static __always_inline
u64 vdso_calc_delta(u64 cycles, u64 last, u64 mask, u32 mult)
{
u64 ret, delta = ((cycles - last) & mask);
u32 dh, dl;
dl = delta;
dh = delta >> 32;
res = mul_u32_u32(al, mul);
if (ah)
res += mul_u32_u32(ah, mul) << 32;
return res;
}
That's pretty much what __do_get_tspec does in ASM.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists