[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-88USO+fbjBgj35B4fUQ7A_t9nHO_swyN=T1q1G2wViA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:21:48 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] arm64: kprobes: fix kprobes without CONFIG_KRETPROBES
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 18:11, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This allows CONFIG_KRETPROBES to be disabled without disabling
> kprobes entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Can we make kretprobes work with the shadow call stack instead?
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index c4452827419b..98230ae979ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ void __kprobes __used *trampoline_probe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return (void *)orig_ret_address;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
> void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> @@ -564,6 +565,7 @@ int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
> {
> --
> 2.23.0.866.gb869b98d4c-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists