[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f9a4de91f364a5f8ce707c8d8a2344d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:07:15 +0530
From: Harish Bandi <c-hbandi@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Don't vote for specific voltage
+ Bala
On 2019-10-18 23:52, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:24:02PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> Devices with specific voltage requirements should not request voltage
>> from the driver, but instead rely on the system configuration to
>> define
>> appropriate voltages for each rail.
>>
>> This ensures that PMIC and board variations are accounted for,
>> something
>> that the 0.1V range in the hci_qca driver currently tries to address.
>> But on the Lenovo Yoga C630 (with wcn3990) vddch0 is 3.1V, which means
>> the driver will fail to set the voltage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index c07c529b0d81..54aafcc69d06 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ enum qca_speed_type {
>> */
>> struct qca_vreg {
>> const char *name;
>> - unsigned int min_uV;
>> - unsigned int max_uV;
>> unsigned int load_uA;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -1332,10 +1330,10 @@ static const struct hci_uart_proto qca_proto =
>> {
>> static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data_wcn3990 = {
>> .soc_type = QCA_WCN3990,
>> .vregs = (struct qca_vreg []) {
>> - { "vddio", 1800000, 1900000, 15000 },
>> - { "vddxo", 1800000, 1900000, 80000 },
>> - { "vddrf", 1300000, 1350000, 300000 },
>> - { "vddch0", 3300000, 3400000, 450000 },
>> + { "vddio", 15000 },
>> + { "vddxo", 80000 },
>> + { "vddrf", 300000 },
>> + { "vddch0", 450000 },
>> },
>> .num_vregs = 4,
>> };
>> @@ -1343,10 +1341,10 @@ static const struct qca_vreg_data
>> qca_soc_data_wcn3990 = {
>> static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data_wcn3998 = {
>> .soc_type = QCA_WCN3998,
>> .vregs = (struct qca_vreg []) {
>> - { "vddio", 1800000, 1900000, 10000 },
>> - { "vddxo", 1800000, 1900000, 80000 },
>> - { "vddrf", 1300000, 1352000, 300000 },
>> - { "vddch0", 3300000, 3300000, 450000 },
>> + { "vddio", 10000 },
>> + { "vddxo", 80000 },
>> + { "vddrf", 300000 },
>> + { "vddch0", 450000 },
>> },
>> .num_vregs = 4,
>> };
>> @@ -1386,13 +1384,6 @@ static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> static int qca_enable_regulator(struct qca_vreg vregs,
>> struct regulator *regulator)
>> {
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - ret = regulator_set_voltage(regulator, vregs.min_uV,
>> - vregs.max_uV);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> return regulator_enable(regulator);
>>
>> }
>> @@ -1401,7 +1392,6 @@ static void qca_disable_regulator(struct
>> qca_vreg vregs,
>> struct regulator *regulator)
>> {
>> regulator_disable(regulator);
>> - regulator_set_voltage(regulator, 0, vregs.max_uV);
>>
>> }
>
> This was brought up multiple times during the initial review, but
> wasn't addressed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists