[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191021064210.GD27784@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:42:10 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>, emamd001@....edu,
smccaman@....edu, kjlu@....edu, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
nbd@...er.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nbd_genl_status: null check for nla_nest_start
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:40:12AM -0500, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> nla_nest_start may fail and return NULL. The check is inserted, and
> errno is selected based on other call sites within the same source code.
> Update: removed extra new line.
> v3 Update: added release reply, thanks to Michal Kubecek for pointing
> out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/nbd.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index e21d2ded732b..8a9712181c2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -2149,6 +2149,12 @@ static int nbd_genl_status(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> }
>
> dev_list = nla_nest_start_noflag(reply, NBD_ATTR_DEVICE_LIST);
> + if (!dev_list) {
> + nlmsg_free(reply);
> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> if (index == -1) {
> ret = idr_for_each(&nbd_index_idr, &status_cb, reply);
> if (ret) {
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists