linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu/rcu_segcblist: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:49:55 +0800
From:   Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xue.zhihong@....com.cn,
        wang.yi59@....com.cn, up2wing@...il.com, wang.liang82@....com.cn
Subject: [PATCH] rcu/rcu_segcblist: fix -Wmissing-prototypes warnings

We get these warnings when build kernel W=1:
kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c:91:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘rcu_segcblist_set_len’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c:107:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘rcu_segcblist_add_len’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c:137:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘rcu_segcblist_xchg_len’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Commit eda669a6a2c5 ("rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist
structure") introduced this, and make the functions static to fix
them.

Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
index 495c58c..cbc87b8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct rcu_head *rcu_cblist_dequeue(struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
 }
 
 /* Set the length of an rcu_segcblist structure. */
-void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+static void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	atomic_long_set(&rsclp->len, v);
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
  * This increase is fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses
  * both before and after.
  */
-void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+static void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Up to the caller! */
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_inc_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
  * with the actual number of callbacks on the structure.  This exchange is
  * fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses both before and after.
  */
-long rcu_segcblist_xchg_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+static long rcu_segcblist_xchg_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	return atomic_long_xchg(&rsclp->len, v);
-- 
1.8.3.1